While it's fresh in my mind, some quick thoughts: (defn inc-all > "increments every int received in the input channel" > ([in] > (let [out (chan)] > (inc-all in out) > out)) > ([in out] > (go (while true > (>! out (inc (<! in))))) >
A) The first overload and second overload for this function return different things. The first returns the output channel, the second returns a channel that will never yield a value. Is it useful to ever return that? Seems like it should return out too. B) Shouldn't that loop consider when the in channel gets closed? I realize that in many cases channels won't ever be closed, but for utilities it seems wise to expect that or document if you don't expect it. C) For something like the Rx operators, you want to signal the end of a sequence. If somebody else gives you a channel to write to, is it couth to close it? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
