> These look great! Thanks!
> I would, however, avoid using go-as. [...snip...] Yeah, David Nolen mentioned that in IRC. I was thinking something along the lines of (go-as [c blah] ...) which would basically do (let [c (or blah (chan))] ...) Next time I get some extra cycles, I'll investigate what that would look like. Thoughts on if-recv, when-recv, dorecv, etc? If you like those, I'd love to hear thoughts on if / how to extend them for multiplexing. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
