Very cool, will have to try it out!

That said, I think we should start talking about how to make the traditional 
debugging cycle accessible in Clojure.  


On Friday, May 31, 2013 at 8:27 AM, dgrnbrg wrote:

> I'd like to point out a similar library I wrote for Clojure called spyscope: 
> https://github.com/dgrnbrg/spyscope
>  
> With spyscope, you can write a handful of characters and get the stack frame, 
> form, and its value pretty-printed and logged to a queue for future querying.
>  
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:28:19 PM UTC-4, David Jacobs wrote:
> > That's true -- that's why I wrote up the Letters debugging mini-library for 
> > Ruby (lettersrb.com (http://lettersrb.com)). However, there's friction 
> > there, too, and a surprising number of people don't think to do this.    
> >  
> >  
> > On Thursday, May 30, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:  
> >  
> > > Not really true, most of my programs contain this function:  
> > >    
> > > (defn debug [x]  
> > > (pprint x)  
> > > x)  
> > >    
> > > Now I can do this:  
> > >    
> > > (comp foo debug bar)  
> > >    
> > > Also, with some reader literal magic, I could write something to let me 
> > > do this:  
> > >    
> > > (myfunc foo #dbg bar)  
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, David Jacobs <da...@wit.io 
> > > (mailto:da...@wit.io)> wrote:  
> > > > Two more things:  
> > > >    
> > > > 1) printing is often not a viable option for lazily eval-ed sequences 
> > > > or async processes -- the output gets jumbled! And believe me, when a 
> > > > new Clojure dev sees that for the first time, he/she wants to quit.    
> > > > 2) printing is terrible for elegant clojure code -- thing (comp f g h 
> > > > (partial map z)) -- in order to figure out anything about dynamic data 
> > > > flowing through, you have to break apart that composition or add a let 
> > > > binding in one of those functions before returning a value. Both of 
> > > > those involve a lot of friction.  
> > > >    
> > > >    
> > > > On Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:00:13 PM UTC-7, raould wrote:  
> > > > > for a long time haskell did not have a debugger. that sucked, imho.   
> > > > >  
> > > >    
> > > > --    
> > > > --    
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > > > Groups "Clojure" group.  
> > > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
> > > > (mailto:clo...@googlegroups.com)  
> > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > > > your first post.  
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
> > > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com (mailto:clojure%2b...@googlegroups.com)  
> > > > For more options, visit this group at  
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en  
> > > > ---    
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups "Clojure" group.  
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > > > an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com 
> > > > (mailto:clojure%2b...@googlegroups.com).  
> > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.  
> > > >    
> > > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > >    
> > > --    
> > > “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking 
> > > zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C 
> > > programs.”  
> > > (Robert Firth)    
> > >    
> > > --    
> > > --    
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > > Groups "Clojure" group.  
> > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
> > > (mailto:clo...@googlegroups.com)  
> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > > your first post.  
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
> > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com (mailto:clojure+u...@googlegroups.com)  
> > > For more options, visit this group at  
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en  
> > > ---    
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > > "Clojure" group.  
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com 
> > > (mailto:clojure+u...@googlegroups.com).  
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.  
> > >    
> > >    
> >  
> >  
> >  
> --  
> --  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>   
>   

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to