Who?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:51 PM, gaz jones <gareth.e.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm starting to miss Ken Wesson. > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Gary Trakhman <gary.trakh...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I've volunteered on the pycon AV team, in 2009, it's 1000x more work than >> what you described further up in the thread, a minimum wage worker holding >> something steady. It requires a lot of coordination, and I think the cost >> to the conference would be much higher than InfoQ as well. >> >> On Monday, March 25, 2013 1:05:51 PM UTC-4, Cedric Greevey wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Michael Klishin <michael....@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/25 Cedric Greevey <cgre...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> Don't forget that Youtube has MILLIONS of visitors per month. >>>>> >>>>> Imagine the impact if the videos were available when demand for them >>>>> was actually at its peak, rather than after half the people that had been >>>>> interested have forgotten all about them. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I challenge you to put together a technical videos channel that has >>>> millions of visitors per month. >>>> >>> >>> Another minute, another straw man. My point is that the needed video >>> hosting capability already exists (and even has monetize options). Of >>> *course* it will be expensive to go the "reinvent all needed wheels" route. >>> >>> I don't get it. The thread got complaints that the videos were being >>> produced slowly and inefficiently, yet as soon as someone actually >>> suggested ways to potentially make the process faster and more efficient, >>> practically *everyone* leapt to the defense of those same slow and >>> inefficient methods that they'd previously complained about. I guess >>> abstract kvetching is okay, but concrete suggestions are frightening >>> because they might *actually lead to change* or something. Although that >>> still doesn't explain why someone then had the gall to criticize *me* for >>> not making concrete and constructive suggestions, when that's exactly what >>> I *did* do after *other people* had merely complained without making any >>> suggestions. >>> >>> Of course, I don't really *need* to argue anymore, because someone else >>> helpfully pointed out that an existing conference already does a better >>> job: pycon. That completely disproves the entire class of arguments along >>> the lines of "making *conference proceedings* videos is somehow some sort >>> of a special case and it HAS to be slow and expensive!", of which we've >>> seen several, sadly including some *after* pycon was first mentioned. >>> >>> -- >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
