how could it not be true? it's in data represented in memory.
On Monday, 25 March 2013 23:37:33 UTC+11, Jim foo.bar wrote: > > On 25/03/13 12:28, Michael Klishin wrote: > > There is no absolute immutability on the JVM, .NET, in JavaScript. > > There is always a backdoor to mutability. > > But 99.9% of projects won't use it. > > Andy hinted this last night as well...is this true? if I declare a > Integer/String object as private & final within a class, is there a way > to mutate it? I do find this very scary, even in Java as it contradicts > certain things we take for granted... > > Jim > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
