On 25/03/13 12:08, Michael Klishin wrote:
How often do you see implementation details such as
PersistentVector#tail used in Clojure code?
That is what matters.
I've never seen that in Clojure code but is 'how responsible a
programmer is' what really matters? In other words, are clojure's
collection persistent by covention (up to the programmer)? I'd argue
that when you call a collection 'persistent' what matters is
'persistence' and not 'persistent usage'.
by the same token, when we label something as 'transactional' or
'atomic' we expect certain properties by default - not by convention...
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
