yes of course, I noticed your comment and I 'm not saying otherwise but
on the other hand I can't help it...this got me excited!
Jim
On 20/01/13 20:07, David Nolen wrote:
I think we would need to see more comprehensive benchmarks before we
can come to any conclusions.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com
<mailto:jimpil1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I've recently noticed this:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-453
It is for cljs but it makes sense right?
We do have them for maps - how hard can it be to make them for
small vectors as well? In fact I'm surprised we don't have them
already but perhaps I'm missing crucial details... destructuring
would be super-fast yes?
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
<mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
