I think we would need to see more comprehensive benchmarks before we can come to any conclusions.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com>wrote: > I've recently noticed this: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-453 > > It is for cljs but it makes sense right? > We do have them for maps - how hard can it be to make them for small > vectors as well? In fact I'm surprised we don't have them already but > perhaps I'm missing crucial details... destructuring would be super-fast > yes? > > Jim > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
