On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:47:49 PM UTC-5, Terje Norderhaug wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Phil Hagelberg > <ph...@hagelb.org<javascript:>> > wrote: > > However, the likelihood that anyone else will come along in the future > > and name another library clj-xpath is basically nil in this case. > > For standards/recommendations like xpath it would be preferable to > avoid that the first Clojure implementation coming along gets to > monopolize the name. In fact, I've been thinking for a while about > implementing an xpath library for Clojure, talking a different > approach than Kyle, as I've implemented XPath in the past in Common > Lisp as part of an XSLT processor/compiler used in my commercial > products. So I second the use of a group-id for clojure libraries that > use the name of a standard/recommendation in their name. > > Aside: perhaps you could instead use some other unique name for your project. Like xpathfinder or xml-strider or something?
---John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
