On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: > However, the likelihood that anyone else will come along in the future > and name another library clj-xpath is basically nil in this case.
For standards/recommendations like xpath it would be preferable to avoid that the first Clojure implementation coming along gets to monopolize the name. In fact, I've been thinking for a while about implementing an xpath library for Clojure, talking a different approach than Kyle, as I've implemented XPath in the past in Common Lisp as part of an XSLT processor/compiler used in my commercial products. So I second the use of a group-id for clojure libraries that use the name of a standard/recommendation in their name. -- Terje Norderhaug -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
