On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: >> >> (-> ((fn [] >> (let [a 1] >> (println "this is a: " a) >> a))) >> ((fn [a] >> (let [b 2] >> (println "this is b: " b) >> (list a b)))) >> ((fn [[a b]] >> (let [c 3] >> (println "this is c: " c) >> (println "Sum: " (+ a b c)))))) > > > Why should you have to change the shape of your program to insert some > debugging statements?
Writing a macro like JvJ did or writing all of your code inside of a let statement like you did is also changing the shape of your program just to print debug statements isn't it? Sorry the way I understood the use case that you need to do something, anything, maybe some expensive, before doing the *next thing*, and same goes before the *next thing*. I didn't read it as inserting debug statements at all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
