On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:23 PM, JvJ <kfjwhee...@gmail.com> wrote: > I didn't realize you could bind to empty identifiers like that. Alright, > that makes more sense. I figured I was missing something. >
Just to be clear _ has not special meaning beyond convention. I could have used x but that doesn't convey that we don't care about the return value. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
