On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Cohen <aa...@assonance.org> wrote:
> Does the principle of least surprise suggest that multiple bindings be
> combined with AND or OR?
My own personal opinion is that it makes sense in combination with 'and',
but others may feel differently. E.g.,
(when-let [a (allocate-thing) b (read-into-thing a) c
(extract-something-from-thing b)]
(do-something-with c))
makes intuitive sense to me. If, at any stage of the execution, any of a,
b or c was nil, the evaluation would stop and the (when-let) form would
return nil.
- Dan C.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
