On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Armando Blancas <abm221...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a distinction without a difference. I'm saying the host interop > overwhelms the cool stuff. That's the kind of code I find foolish to write > in product development. I don't advocate going back and forth to Java, but > when the host takes over, that's sign that *it* can be the simpler, better > choice.
Even if high-performance numeric Clojure code looks an awful lot like Java, Java with macros still beats Java without macros. ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
