That's a distinction without a difference. I'm saying the host interop overwhelms the cool stuff. That's the kind of code I find foolish to write in product development. I don't advocate going back and forth to Java, but when the host takes over, that's sign that *it* can be the simpler, better choice.
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:25:16 PM UTC-7, David Nolen wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Armando Blancas wrote: > >> If anything, the java-in-parens gvec.clj *proves* how difficult it is to >> get Java perf in Clojure. The good "real world" perf looks a lot like Java, >> regardless of where you place the parens. So I agree with puzzler, Java is >> simpler in Java. >> > > I'm not sure by what path you've come to this conclusion. I think gvec.clj > demonstrates precisely the kind of code one would never want to write in > Java. It's not even possible - Java Generics don't support primitives. > > David > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
