Tim, I've been wanting this for some time. Obviously the java interop stuff poses challenges, but the clojure data types, protocols, immutable objects, clojure syntax, etc... would make for a nice dialect of lisp to be used alongside other CL code. (I guess I'm in the small minority of folks that is much more interested in interacting with existing Common Lisp code than with existing Java libraries.)
Cyrus On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:18 PM, daly wrote: > It seems to me that a Clojure in Common Lisp might be the > easiest non-JVM port. It would be a DSL within Common Lisp. > A CL implementation would even allow rewriting the normal > COND syntax. Is there an obvious reason why this would be > a bad idea? > > Heck, it might even be possible to make the port literate :-) > > Tim Daly > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
