On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 16:26 -0800, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, daly <d...@axiom-developer.org> wrote: > > It seems to me that a Clojure in Common Lisp might be the > > easiest non-JVM port. It would be a DSL within Common Lisp. > > A CL implementation would even allow rewriting the normal > > COND syntax. Is there an obvious reason why this would be > > a bad idea? > > The biggest problem I can see is that if you do this I will be tempted > to port it to Emacs Lisp as well, the thought of which is slightly > disturbing. > > -Phil > I knocked together a REPL in its own package.
Is there a spec somewhere of the exact syntax accepted by the Clojure reader? Tim Daly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
