On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, daly <d...@axiom-developer.org> wrote:
> It seems to me that a Clojure in Common Lisp might be the
> easiest non-JVM port. It would be a DSL within Common Lisp.
> A CL implementation would even allow rewriting the normal
> COND syntax. Is there an obvious reason why this would be
> a bad idea?

The biggest problem I can see is that if you do this I will be tempted
to port it to Emacs Lisp as well, the thought of which is slightly
disturbing.

-Phil

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to