On Jul 29, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Ken Wesson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Sorry to make things look different than the apparent consensus of the >> participants to this thread, but isn't it a little bit too prematurate to >> put that pressure on Clooj ? >> I understand the desire to have Clooj for "filling the gap". >> But my question is : is it ready yet ? > > From what I've heard, the only thing missing I'd consider really > important is a way to auto-reindent one or more lines. (Others might > consider syntax highlighting to be crucial as well; I don't know.)
Considering how very young it is, it's probably not realistic to consider it ready quite yet. That said, I'm a clooj cheerleader because I think that it, when combined with lein or cake, hits the ease/completeness sweet spot in a way that no other tool currently does. THAT said, I've just begun to try to work in it seriously, and I just sent three messages raising new issues to the clooj list. *THAT* said, the improvements have been coming fast, and particularly if others pitch in I think it could be "real good" "real soon". -Lee -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
