Sorry to make things look different than the apparent consensus of the participants to this thread, but isn't it a little bit too prematurate to put that pressure on Clooj ?
I understand the desire to have Clooj for "filling the gap". But my question is : is it ready yet ? 2011/7/29 nchurch <nchubr...@gmail.com> > Here's a tutorial on getting started with Clooj: > > http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/getting+started+with+Clooj > > If this looks good to people, I'll try to get permission to reorganize > the Getting Started docs a little. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
