On Jul 3, 6:15 am, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There's one obvious use case for such a wrapper function, though: if > you'll want to pass the Java method to HOFs from time to time. You > can't directly pass a Java method to a HOF, but you can pass such a > wrapper function. >
Pardon me if I'm wrong, but could you not use an anonymous function in those places where you'd need to pass it to a HOF and continue to use it directly elsewhere? That would probably be how I'd prefer it, as it'd mean less functions to keep track of, and less indirection (decoupling api concerns aside). > -- > Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?! > Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true > hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a language for a more > civilized age. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
