I have noticed some projects go to an x.5 release when they are half- ready to move to (inc x).0 -- in this case which would be 1.5 instead of 1.3 or 2.0 version. Just a thought.
Regards, Shantanu On Feb 24, 7:56 pm, semperos <daniel.l.grego...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another vote for semantic versioning. I agree that the "claim to 2.0" comes > with some expectations about environment and overall development experience, > but I think that *backwards incompatible changes* deserve a major version > bump, to keep heads straight and make it clear to newcomers where the lines > are drawn. > > If we don't make the switch now, at which future set of breaking changes > will we decide it's time to call it 2.0? We'd basically have to create our > own criteria and have the "Clojure flavored" semantic versioning scheme, > which I think would be more arbitrary and harder for folks to follow. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
