Another vote for semantic versioning. I agree that the "claim to 2.0" comes with some expectations about environment and overall development experience, but I think that *backwards incompatible changes* deserve a major version bump, to keep heads straight and make it clear to newcomers where the lines are drawn.
If we don't make the switch now, at which future set of breaking changes will we decide it's time to call it 2.0? We'd basically have to create our own criteria and have the "Clojure flavored" semantic versioning scheme, which I think would be more arbitrary and harder for folks to follow. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
