On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:51:40 -0500 > Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: >> But that's neglecting a crucial biasing factor: with project-hosting >> sites it's very easy to just slap together a few text blurbs for the >> front page and carry on your business using the tracker and >> repository; with regular web hosting you need to think a bit and >> actually come up with some page content, and you probably wouldn't >> have bothered to get regular web hosting if you weren't intending to. >> So if there's a regular .com site it's got a higher probability of >> being easy for end-users to navigate versus a randomly-selected >> sourceforge page. > > Disagree, and already provided a counter-example.
A counter-example to what? The argument I made is probabilistic. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
