"Ken Wesson" <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Mike Meyer ><mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: >> Ditto. Most often, the "code" site is the sole project site, and >everything is there. Some larger projects may have a separate "home" >page, but it's always prominently mentioned on the "code" site. In >either case, the "code" site is worth checking out - especially if it's >the first link turned up by Google. > >The real problem is that navigating those sites can be a pain, if you >aren't intimately familiar with how the project is organized. Ever >land at some SourceForge page, see just a brief description of what >the project's software is supposed to do and a bunch of SourceForge >infrastructure, click "files", and encounter a bewildering array of >zips and binaries, none clearly labeled as, say, the Windows installer >for the current version?
Sure, Sturgeon's law is closer to 99% than 90% for the web. But if you don't even look at the right page to start with because of a false assumption, then any suggestions for fixing it are at best futile. -- Sent from my Android tablet with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
