On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Luc Prefontaine
<lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> wrote:
> Not reading wiki pages available, not investigating available links
> about ccw are more a sign of mental laziness than anything else or
> some form of disdain.

Or, they can be a sign of not having been pointed to the links by the
install process, and none of them looking particularly promising when
returned as Google hits.

> If these mundane activities are not important to you then maybe you
> should balance your post contents a bit and change the ranting/facts
> ratio. You cannot hold others responsible for your lack of knowledge
> in some areas.

True. But I can certainly hold others responsible for a) not setting
up conditions where a majority of the people in some group G will
naturally encounter certain information I, but then b) expressing an
expectation that the people in group G will know I anyway, and c)
being condescending towards anyone you encounter from G that does not
know I.

> I see the same pattern with your ranting against the numeric
> optimizations in 1.3. All of these discussions are available in the
> google group mailing list but it seems you did not read them to fully
> understand the pros and cons of each approach that where evaluated.

Because it was a long, rambling discussion thread full of all manner
of tangents, plus stuff that was in flux and later changed, plus ...
etc.

I asked if someone could point me to a summary or precis of the key,
still-relevant facts and arguments, something that could get me up to
speed with, you know, *actual speed* instead of taking days. The
closest I got was a four-page-or-so summary of two proposed versions
of the changes, and I did read that.

> You have been asked kindly to change your tone.

Are you implying a threat?

The next part of your post seemed to descend into name-calling, more
threats, and other unconstructive material, so I did not bother to
read further.

Have a good day.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to