>>> >>> Emacs org-mode, on the other hand, is a useful development >>> technology but it really isn't literate programming. >>> >> I would be interested to hear your thoughts as to why Org-mode is not a >> literate programming tool. > I never said org-mode wasn't a 'literate programming tool'. It is clearly an > outstanding version of a literate programming tool. What I said was that > org-mode "really isn't literate programming". >
Ok, then it sounds like we're in agreement. I just was confused by the use of "org-mode" as a verb to describe one particular task when it supports many disparate tasks, including LP as you have defined it. Thanks for the explanation. Cheers -- Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
