On 1/5/2011 11:19 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Emacs org-mode, on the other hand, is a useful development
technology but it really isn't literate programming.
I would be interested to hear your thoughts as to why Org-mode is not a
literate programming tool.
I never said org-mode wasn't a 'literate programming tool'. It is clearly an
outstanding version of a literate programming tool. What I said was that
org-mode "really isn't literate programming".
Ok, then it sounds like we're in agreement. I just was confused by the
use of "org-mode" as a verb to describe one particular task when it
supports many disparate tasks, including LP as you have defined it.
So my comment was unclear. I so badly need an Editor-in-Chief to
scan my emails for clarity, punctuation, and other things literate
people ought have mastered by now. Sorry about that.
Thanks for the explanation.
Cheers -- Eric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
