On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pros (heard from others so far and taken on faith): > * Clojure's code base can be made internally simpler. > * It's easier to implement what was already implemented. (?) > * Code that isn't performance-critical may get slightly faster. > Not many people have mentioned concrete benefits from this change because they have already been enumerated in the original thread about the 1.3 primitive math change. So I don't think anyone is going to defend or critique your arguments. >From *my* experience unless you're working on Project Euler, you won't have to change your code. I've have yet to hear anyone else state otherwise, which, admittedly, is not conclusive, but perhaps a good sign. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
