On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:07 AM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:38 AM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Are you honestly suggesting I search the archives for every word of >> >> every thought that it ever occurs to me to post here? >> > >> > With all due respect, the topic has already been bike shedded into the >> > ground by many members in the community. >> >> Fascinating. Your point being? That statement of yours does not, after >> all, magically make searching the archive for every word in every post >> you ever think of posting suddenly become practical. > > I wasn't suggesting you do that. People earlier in the post gave links to > the thread.
The first link to the thread was posted AFTER I was castigated with the phrase "this topic has been discussed to death before on this group." So, no, people "earlier in the post" did NOT give links to the thread. People "earlier in the post" DID expect me to have read it before any of them mentioned it. And that it what I took issue with. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
