On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:14 PM, jweiss <jeffrey.m.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's totally different than nth for a set being undefined. It's undefined > on purpose. > > Now, if you are using a sorted-set, then you have a point there, I > would expect that nth means something then. But yeah, clojure doesn't > let you call nth on it directly, you have to make a seq out of it > first.
I vote to make nth work on sets and maps, in general, sorted and otherwise, with the well-defined semantics of (identical? (nth set-or-map) (nth (seq (set-or-map)))). More generally, let nth work on anything that seq works on, by calling seq on its argument when necessary. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
