Hello all I have following question to Rich and other core developers of Clojure - why parameters destructuring requires presence of 'nth' implementation for destructuring of sequences?
The [[x & more]] idiom is very popular and could make code more concise, but it doesn't work for sets and some other collections, like java's HashMap, etc. If this is performance-related problem - may we could have 2 different implementations, depending on sequence type? I found this when trying to use string/join function for set, and fixed this in http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-687 - so we can use join for any sequence -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://alexott.net/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ Skype: alex.ott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
