On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:26 PM, <lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> wrote: > Doing the reverse is non sense (choosing a framework based on some hyped > reviews and then use for every need). ... > We cannot rewrite the whole universe in Clojure in one year. That's a fact. > It's improving but will take some time to cover a number of areas.
We seem to be in a similar position. We have a large CFML web application using frameworks that were decided before I joined the project. I initially introduced some Scala to handle some performance-critical XML transformations. Now I'm looking at the long-term roadmap for what we need to continue to grow our business and I'm prototyping sections of the application in Clojure but we're a bit hamstrung by some restrictions in the frameworks that were chosen (mainly the ColdBox MVC framework - CFML itself is not a problem) so until I can break some dependency chains, I can't move Clojure into production. But that will happen fairly soon (this past weekend I rewrote one core low-level component in Clojure to get us a step closer). I expect we'll stay with CFML for application views - CFML is a great HTML templating language - and we'll switch to a much simpler CFML MVC framework to replace ColdBox (FW/1 - which I wrote and published last year) so the controllers will stay in CFML. But the model will slowly migrate entirely to Clojure over time I expect. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
