That might be an inf-lisp thing; I haven't seen it work like that in slime.
-Phil On Oct 5, 2010 5:06 PM, "psfblair" <psfbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would have sworn that when I was doing C-c C-r originally I was > seeing the region be copied in at the REPL prompt and evaluated. That > isn't what's happening now--can anyone else confirm that I shouldn't > be expecting to see this? > > Thx. > > On Sep 28, 1:37 pm, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups. > 620...@mired.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:58:56 -0700 (PDT) >> >> >> >> >> >> psfblair <psfbl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I could do this, but right now I'm just playing with C-c C-r to >> > evaluate regions, instead of compiling the entire file. And I'd swear >> > this used to put the evaluation in the REPL. >> >> > On Sep 27, 10:59 pm, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote: >> > > C-c C-k in the .clj buffer is easier and equivalent (or at least very >> > > similar) >> >> > > On Sep 27, 12:27 pm, Linus Ericsson <oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > > I recognize that one. The repl haven't loaded the file your editing. >> >> > > > My (temporary) solution is to do a (load-file "<the file your editing>") >> > > > after each edit that I want to debug, but that's a bit boring. I guess there >> > > > is some kind of reload feature somewhere... >> >> > > > /Linus >> >> > > > 2010/9/27 psfblair <psfbl...@gmail.com> >> >> > > > > I found the old thread below, but unfortunately the solution isn't >> > > > > working for me. If I have a foo.clj file in a buffer and evaluate >> > > > > region on >> >> > > > > (defn foo [] (+ 1 2)) >> >> > > > > I get >> >> > > > > #'user/foo in the minibuffer. If I then evaluate region on >> >> > > > > (foo) >> >> > > > > I get 3 in the minibuffer. The slime REPL is giving me a prompt user> >> > > > > so I'm assuming it's in the user namespace, but I can't seem to get >> > > > > expressions from the text buffer to evaluate in there. >> >> > > > > On Mar 28, 5:01 am, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > > On 27 March 2010 22:25, alux <alu...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > But now I see people use the result of this evaluation in their REPL >> > > > > > > (I see this in videos, so I cant ask 'em :). This doesnt work at all >> > > > > > > for me. I get the result in the minibuffer (this thing at the very >> > > > > > > bottom) and thats it. >> >> > > > > > If the form you evaluate is of the def* variety, it's going to affect >> > > > > > the namespace it resides in and not the namespace of the REPL. Thus, >> > > > > > if you have e.g. (ns foo) at the top of the file, yet you're working >> > > > > > in the user namespace at the REPL, then after using C-x C-e to >> > > > > > evaluate a function definition in your file, you'll have to say >> > > > > > something like foo/bar to reach it from the REPL. (Or (use :reload-all >> > > > > > 'foo), if you prefer.) >> >> > > > > > If there is no namespace declaration in the file, then the expression >> > > > > > will be evaluated in the user namespace, which means that you'll be >> > > > > > able to use it straight away if that's your REPL's namespace. (If you >> > > > > > say (in-ns 'foo) or (ns foo) at the REPL, then you'll have to say >> > > > > > something like user/bar to reach your function.) >> >> > > > > > Sincerely, >> > > > > > Michał >> >> > > > > -- >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > > > Groups "Clojure" group. >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> > > > > your first post. >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> <clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>> >> > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> >> Actually, this sounds like standard behavior for an integrated >> EMACS/REPL to me: "sending" code from the edited file to the REPL >> evaluates them in the REPL, but doesn't print them: you either get a >> message in the minibuffer or a short note in the buffer. Normal usage >> is to edit a function, send it to the REPL, then switch to the repl >> and test the newly defined function(s) (usually just M-p to recall the >> just failed test). >> >> In particular, SWANK/SLIME prints the value of the last expression in >> the evaluate region in the minibuffer. At least, that's what' it's >> always done for me. >> >> <mike >> -- >> Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html >> Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. >> >> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail -www.asciiribbon.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
