I would have sworn that when I was doing C-c C-r originally I was seeing the region be copied in at the REPL prompt and evaluated. That isn't what's happening now--can anyone else confirm that I shouldn't be expecting to see this?
Thx. On Sep 28, 1:37 pm, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups. 620...@mired.org> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:58:56 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > psfblair <psfbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I could do this, but right now I'm just playing with C-c C-r to > > evaluate regions, instead of compiling the entire file. And I'd swear > > this used to put the evaluation in the REPL. > > > On Sep 27, 10:59 pm, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > > > C-c C-k in the .clj buffer is easier and equivalent (or at least very > > > similar) > > > > On Sep 27, 12:27 pm, Linus Ericsson <oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > I recognize that one. The repl haven't loaded the file your editing. > > > > > My (temporary) solution is to do a (load-file "<the file your editing>") > > > > after each edit that I want to debug, but that's a bit boring. I guess > > > > there > > > > is some kind of reload feature somewhere... > > > > > /Linus > > > > > 2010/9/27 psfblair <psfbl...@gmail.com> > > > > > > I found the old thread below, but unfortunately the solution isn't > > > > > working for me. If I have a foo.clj file in a buffer and evaluate > > > > > region on > > > > > > (defn foo [] (+ 1 2)) > > > > > > I get > > > > > > #'user/foo in the minibuffer. If I then evaluate region on > > > > > > (foo) > > > > > > I get 3 in the minibuffer. The slime REPL is giving me a prompt user> > > > > > so I'm assuming it's in the user namespace, but I can't seem to get > > > > > expressions from the text buffer to evaluate in there. > > > > > > On Mar 28, 5:01 am, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 27 March 2010 22:25, alux <alu...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > But now I see people use the result of this evaluation in their > > > > > > > REPL > > > > > > > (I see this in videos, so I cant ask 'em :). This doesnt work at > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > for me. I get the result in the minibuffer (this thing at the very > > > > > > > bottom) and thats it. > > > > > > > If the form you evaluate is of the def* variety, it's going to > > > > > > affect > > > > > > the namespace it resides in and not the namespace of the REPL. Thus, > > > > > > if you have e.g. (ns foo) at the top of the file, yet you're working > > > > > > in the user namespace at the REPL, then after using C-x C-e to > > > > > > evaluate a function definition in your file, you'll have to say > > > > > > something like foo/bar to reach it from the REPL. (Or (use > > > > > > :reload-all > > > > > > 'foo), if you prefer.) > > > > > > > If there is no namespace declaration in the file, then the > > > > > > expression > > > > > > will be evaluated in the user namespace, which means that you'll be > > > > > > able to use it straight away if that's your REPL's namespace. (If > > > > > > you > > > > > > say (in-ns 'foo) or (ns foo) at the REPL, then you'll have to say > > > > > > something like user/bar to reach your function.) > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > Michał > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > > > > > with > > > > > your first post. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > Actually, this sounds like standard behavior for an integrated > EMACS/REPL to me: "sending" code from the edited file to the REPL > evaluates them in the REPL, but doesn't print them: you either get a > message in the minibuffer or a short note in the buffer. Normal usage > is to edit a function, send it to the REPL, then switch to the repl > and test the newly defined function(s) (usually just M-p to recall the > just failed test). > > In particular, SWANK/SLIME prints the value of the last expression in > the evaluate region in the minibuffer. At least, that's what' it's > always done for me. > > <mike > -- > Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html > Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. > > O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail -www.asciiribbon.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
