On Aug 18, 2:42 am, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > "nils replace nils when there are fewer substitutions than nil > positions" was one of the requirements. > > From the first post: > > > If nil is encountered in the first sequence and the second sequence is > > exhaused, nil will be returned: > > > e.g. user> (nil-coalesce (nil 1 2 3 nil nil) (4 5)) > > (4 1 2 3 5 nil)
_Returning_ nil is the requirement, which is what happens in the code I posted (it behaves the same as other submissions as far as I can tell). Replacing nil with nil in the result vector isn't necessary for that to happen. Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
