Hi, Am 17.08.2010 um 21:56 schrieb Rising_Phorce:
> I posted because clojure *tends* to be so succinct and in this case > the solution complexity seems disproportionate to the problem. I think the plain lazy-seq version is a pretty straight-forward translation. I don't think, that it is overly complex. In fact it should be easy to understand what happens. I sometimes have trouble in this respect when I see (map first ...) and the likes. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
