Hi, Am 19.07.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Peter Schuller:
>> I haven't tested what happens to the deftest stuff, but the „moving >> function“ could be addressed. > > Cool. I had not yet run into the moving function case with clojure (I > did several times with Common Lisp), so that might be a non-issue. I > was just presuming that no magic was going on. It turns out you shouldn't also listen to me. I think I will stop writing emails for today. I got caught by the last-var-wins feature. Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT user=> (require 'foo.bar) nil user=> (foo.bar/baz) 5 ; Remove function baz here from file user=> (require :reload 'foo.bar) nil user=> (foo.bar/baz) 5 In my stupidity I chose prn as function name, which removed from the namespace on reload, because clojure.core/prn „overwrites“ the Var again. Maybe such a functionality could be also implemented for normal reload? But then what happens to other namespaces which refer to this Var? I admit, this is not a trivial question. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
