that's too bad. i'm actually more interested in terracotta as a persistence solution than as a distributed computing solution.
On Jul 11, 9:02 pm, rob levy <r.p.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been following this too, and have not heard anything in a while. I > know that Luc Prefontaine was trying to get terracotta to work with Clojure > as well. I have not heard any news recently. A potentially more > straightforward solution for distributed processing right now is swarmiji. > With this it seems you need to be more explicit about dispatching in > swarmiji, where as in Terracotta, at least as I understand it not having > tried it out, your agents will automatically find a machine to run on, just > as they run on some thread when your JVM is running the normal way on a > single machine. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:50 PM, scx <mark_addle...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > > hi -- > > > i've seen paul standig's work with clojure + terracotta. wondering if > > anyone has continued his work? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
