Hi -- I'm noob to both Clojure and Terracotta but if you're willing to tolerate basic questions from me, I'd be very interested in helping out.
On Jul 12, 3:36 am, peter veentjer <alarmnum...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think it every is going to scale. > > MVCC/TL2 based STM designs rely on a central clock, so if you can > update the clock in 0.1 ms on all machines, the maximum throughput is > 1/0.0001 = 10.000 transactions/second... no matter how many machines > you throw at it. Even on a single machine the central clock can cause > scalability problems (10/20M transactions/second and this will degrade > when you throw more cores at it). > > This is one of the reasons I dropped the TL2 approach for Multiverse > and switched over to the SkySTM model (with some magic of my own) that > doesn't relied as much on a central mechanism. > > On Jul 11, 6:50 pm, scx <mark_addle...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > > > > > hi -- > > > i've seen paul standig's work with clojure +terracotta. wondering if > > anyone has continued his work? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
