On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:42:33 -0400
Daniel Gagnon <redalas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wrong/Misinformed ideas:
> > - Clojure 1.1 is not out of date. While it may seem to an outsider that you
> > need to be on 1.2 you would be very wrong. 1.2 certainly brings great things
> > to the table but they are built upon having a good understanding of what
> > currently exists in 1.1. Staying off the cutting edge really prevents a lot
> > of headaches. If you want to be on the cutting edge you are probably
> > expecting headaches and maybe even actively involved in fixing them.
> Then why is labrepl relying on 1.2?
I would say it doesn't - there's a quick tour that shows it *using*
1.2, but the official readme that the tour links to says to download
Clojure 1.1. Of course, I couldn't find anything that really looks
like a release, so maybe I'm looking in the wrong place.
On the other hand, if you're grabbing sources from a repo, then you're
(again) using unreleased software, and it's not at all uncommon for
people building things like labrepl to work with unreleased versions
of things in the role that clojure plays, so that they'll have the
1.2-clojure version of labrepl ready to roll out when clojure 1.2 is
released.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
