> > Wrong/Misinformed ideas: > - Clojure 1.1 is not out of date. While it may seem to an outsider that you > need to be on 1.2 you would be very wrong. 1.2 certainly brings great things > to the table but they are built upon having a good understanding of what > currently exists in 1.1. Staying off the cutting edge really prevents a lot > of headaches. If you want to be on the cutting edge you are probably > expecting headaches and maybe even actively involved in fixing them. > > Then why is labrepl relying on 1.2?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
