JavaFx has one other major issue. The scene graph isn't accessible outside
of JavaFx script.


On Friday, May 28, 2010, Luke VanderHart <luke.vanderh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My understanding may be wrong, but I think JavaFX is intended more as
> a competitor to Flash or Silverlight than a GUI toolkit. It'd probably
> be great for a Clojure games framework, or for simple graphical
> drawing and such, but I'm not sure it's appropriate for a complex,
> high performance GUI. In fact, according to the Wiki page, if you want
> to use desktop style widgets, you actually end up embedding Swing
> components *within* JavaFX anyway.
>
> On May 28, 9:59 am, mmwaikar <mmwai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I work on .Net, so my observation could be totally wrong, but I think
>> JavaFx could be an option to consider (specially because of its JSON
>> kind of syntax).
>> I am working on a WPF project currently, and although WPF is big and
>> complex, the kind of UIs one can build with it is amazing, and JavaFx
>> looked similar to me in intent and purpose.
>>
>> So I am really surprised why no one mentioned JavaFx. Is it because
>> it's new?
>>
>> On May 27, 11:18 am, Luke VanderHart <luke.vanderh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > My side project is a fairly complex GUI application written in
>> > Clojure. Recently, I've become irritated with using Java interop for
>> > everything. It's not that Clojure doesn't have nice java interop - it
>> > does. It's just that when interacting with a GUI framework, which is a
>> > large part of my app, I have to be back in mutable object-oriented
>> > land, worrying about class hierarchies, mutable state, locks, etc.
>> > Yucky.
>>
>> > So, with a perhaps dangerous lack of sanity and without any guarantee
>> > of success, I've decided to try my hand at writing an idiomatic
>> > Clojure GUI library. If I have success (which I doubt) I will of
>> > course make it available as open source.
>>
>> > I intend for it to be mostly declarative, with a nice DSL for defining
>> > GUI elements. Each component will also implement map, and use one of
>> > Clojure's reference types as an interface for inspecting / updating
>> > its state. I may also implement some aspects of Functional Reactive
>> > Programming wherever it's convenient to do so.
>>
>> > What you all must help me decide is what GUI framework to use as the
>> > underpinnings of it. It's genuinely hard to decide. I have at least
>> > some experience with all of them, so I have no strong preference, but
>> > I'd like to get your input. I did consider trying to make it abstract
>> > enough that you could plug in *any* of them under the hood, but
>> > there's enough differences between the frameworks that that would get
>> > very ugly very fast.
>>
>> > Possibilities are:
>>
>> > AWT
>> > Pros: native widgets, bundled with Java, low-level
>> > Cons: few widgets, considered somewhat obselete
>>
>> > Swing
>> > Pros: bundled with Java, good widget selection
>> > Cons: non-native widgets
>>
>> > SWT
>> > Pros: native widgets, widely used
>> > Cons: requires platform-specific libs
>>
>> > QT Jambi
>> > Pros: native widgets, huge widget selection, highly-regarded framework
>> > Cons: requires platform-specific libs, writing custom widgets is
>> > hairy, momentum and support seem to be lagging since Nokia dropped
>> > official support.
>>
>> > Remember, the actual API won't matter - that will be completely
>> > abstracted away. So try to focus on the framework's look and feel.
>> > Also let me know if I've missed any of the framework's key
>> > characteristics.
>>
>> > Thanks!
>>
>> > -Luke
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to