On Dec 13, 1:24 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> fnil seems to me to have greater utility than patching all functions
> that apply functions with default-supplying arguments.

Neat :) I like it.


> The get-in function could be enhanced, and would mirror get.

Should I interpret 'could' as 'patch welcome' or 'let me think about
it'?


Regards,
Tim.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to