Rich, Your example didn't support a variadic signature. Is that the long term plan?
Sean On Jan 29, 8:48 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 30 2009, 6:18 am, Timothy Pratley <timothyprat...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 1:24 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > fnil seems to me to have greater utility than patching all functions > > > that apply functions with default-supplying arguments. > > > Neat :) I like it. > > > > The get-in function could be enhanced, and would mirror get. > > > Should I interpret 'could' as 'patch welcome' or 'let me think about > > it'? > > Patches welcome for get-in, and my fnil. > > Thanks, > > Rich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
