ajay gopalakrishnan <ajgop...@gmail.com> writes: > If possible, I would also want to see a macro that allows me to write (x < y) > instead of (< x y).
Here's Chouser's infix function, which he apparently has never used since writing it: http://paste.lisp.org/display/75230 > (+ x y) can be read literally as "add x to y" > (square x) can be read literally as "squares x" > (< x y) how do you read this literally left-to-right? Ah yeah, that's one that still trips me up. Some people kind of read (< x y z) as (ascending? x y z) and you could think of the < symbol as a ramp going up so the z is above the y is above the x. Even knowing that I still confuse myself occasionally though. I don't have any problems with arithmetic or function calls, I just really expect the larger quantity to be on the "wide" side of the < wedge. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
