AFAIK, such a function is still not in clojure core because it's not clear
to Rich whether f should have one argument (the value), or 2 arguments (key
+ value).

Your version seems good, you can maybe improve it a little bit by using
transients (not tested):

(persistent!
  (reduce (fn [m [k v]]
           (assoc! m k (f v))) (transient {}) m))

HTH,

-- 
Laurent

2009/12/17 C. Florian Ebeling <florian.ebel...@gmail.com>

> I was just wondering how a #'map for maps could be done most
> succinctly. Came up with this:
>
> (defn mapmap
>  "Map values of map m using function f."
>  [f m]
>  (reduce (fn [m [k v]]
>            (assoc m k (f v))) {} m))
>
> But there is probably a more straightforward way. What do you use?
>
> Florian
>
> --
> Florian Ebeling
> florian.ebel...@gmail.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to