> AFAIK, such a function is still not in clojure core because it's not clear
> to Rich whether f should have one argument (the value), or 2 arguments (key
> + value).
That is a good question. But I thought if the key makes a difference,
then one could use standard map and rely on map's collection nature,
using into {} afterwards.
My reasoning was that map does not care about the index of an element
of collection either. So the key should not count in. But there are
valid reasons for the opposite decision as well, I guess.
Florian
--
Florian Ebeling
florian.ebel...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
