I do something similar to Brenton. I use clojure-mode, and vote for keeping it as-is, making SLIME integration optional or ancillary.
Jim On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Brenton <bashw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I use clojure-mode. > > I have a ruby script named clj that I use to start Clojure from the > command line and from emacs. > > When I set up a new Clojure project I create the following files: > > .cljrc.clj > bin/ > src/ > test/ > lib/ > > The clj script does the following: > > 1) Put the standard Clojure jars in the classpath > 2) Find the root of the project that you are working on by searching > up the directory structure for a .cljrc.clj file. .cljrc.clj contains > common functions like (exit) that will get loaded into the 'user > namespace. Creating this file in a directory establishes it as the > root of a Clojure project. > 3) Add any jars within the lib directory to the classpath. > 4) If clj has no parameters then start the REPL in the root of the > project directory, otherwise run a script and pass it any additional > parameters. > > It is not perfect but I like it. I like that the same script is used > to run Clojure from the command line and from emacs. I don't want to > have to configure each in a different way. > > I will try SLIME but if I can't do something like this then I may not > use it (unless there are other clear advantages). > > Thank you Phil for providing clojure-mode. > Brenton > > > > > On Sep 7, 5:36 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: >> I'm working on cleaning up the code for clojure-mode.el, which provides >> Clojure support for Emacs. >> >> It includes some functionality for interacting with subprocesses. This >> is a small subset of the functionality of the functionality included in >> SLIME, but it's simpler and easier to configure. >> >> However, now that clojure-mode has the M-x clojure-install command that >> sets up SLIME etc, I don't know if the built-in subprocess features are >> worth keeping around any more. Personally I have never used them or >> heard of anyone using them; I wonder if they are just legacy baggage. >> >> Would anyone be opposed to their removal? >> >> thanks, >> Phil >> >> http://technomancy.us > > > > -- Jim Menard, j...@io.com, jim.men...@gmail.com http://www.io.com/~jimm/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
