Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, one thing that I (and others) have noticed is that clojure mode
> chokes on the #^{} form metadata on namespaces. (See any of the files
> in clojure-contrib for an example.) I'm not able to reproduce the
> problem now, so if you don't already know what it is, I'll keep my eye
> out for it and send you a proper report when I have it happening.
So I just found out that you can add regular docstrings to namespaces as
per http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/detail?id=30, which was
actually news to me (I thought it was targeted for 1.1). Anyway, given
that you can do docstrings with nicer syntax now and git supports far
more detailed authorship data, is there any reason to still use the #^{}
syntax for namespaces? I must confess I've never liked the way it looks.
-Phil
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
